Week 40: Cemetery (52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks – 2025 Version)

The theme for Week 40 is “Cemetery.” (Honestly, this is one of my favorite themes!) Any memorable trips to an ancestral cemetery? Whose burial place have you searched for, but haven’t found? Any sextons in the family tree? This is their week. Check out all of the 2025 prompts here.

My cemetery story involves the same family. While looking for the possible grave location for my 3rd great grandmother, Harriett Elizabeth Nedry Booth, I found one for a child she had that I didn’t know about. 

After moving back to my home state for my husband’s retirement, I quickly joined the local genealogical society. Okay, it wasn’t quickly, because we moved in 2020 and it was the height of COVID-19 and many organizations had suspended their meetings. So as soon as they were resuming meetings, I joined.

I have accessed the genealogy holdings of the local library for years. However, someone mentioned they had a cemetery book for cemeteries in a nearby town, same county and since it was a huge cemetery and the cemetery that my 3rd great grandmother was buried, according to her death certificate I had the town, not the cemetery name, I decided to look up the book of the three large cemeteries.

I found an entry for an Edson Booth born 1868 and died 1869 and listed as the son of A.H. and H.E. Booth. He was 1 year 5 days per the researchers who recorded the information. 

Harriet married Amos H Booth in 1851. I knew they had three children, Martha, Wilina (my line) and Edwin who was born in Jun 1869. Because Edson was born and died between census records, I made not have ever known. However, Harriet died on Mar 2, 1916 and I decided to revisit the 1900 and the 1910 census, because they do ask how many children a woman had and how many are still living. Did I miss this very important clue?

Sure enough, the 1900 census states she had 4 children and 3 are still living. What a valuable clue I overlooked all these years. Plus, the 1910 census states she had 4 children and 2 are still living.

Another, clue I overlooked because it would have help me realize that my ancestor, Wilina had died before 1910. In my earlier days of research, I did not find her, but her two children were living together. One a married woman was living with her in-laws and her brother (my ancestor) was living with them. I figured something must had happened to the parents to have caused him to live with his sibling and not one of his parents. Actually, Wilina died in 1898 and thus, the reporting numbers on the 1900 census were inaccurate. 

On a side note: last week I wrote about the disappearing Seymour Hiltz, this was Wilina’s first husband and the father of the two children mentioned above.

Even though I still don’t know the exact location of Harriet’s grave, I have some information that I can go to the office of this large cemetery and see if perhaps they have burial records and maybe she is in an unmark grave with her infant son. This clue has help to give me a starting point of which cemetery she might be buried in. I guess I have a little trip in my future. 

Plus, this reminds me to revisit the 1900 and 1910 census records for women who were living during this time period and see if I am missing any possible children. I know that they might not of reported the correct information such as with Harriet in 1900. 

Happy Genealogy Hunting!